On April 11th we will be discussing George Macdonald's Sir Gibbie with Jane as our discussion leader. Sir Gibbie is available from Project Gutenberg HERE
We will also be discussing our schedule for months beyond July.
Our schedule for May through July is given below:
May 9th Dorothy Sayers Letters to a Diminished Church led by Cristabel
June 13th Humphrey Carpenter's The Inklings led by Ray
July 11th Owen Barfield's Saving the Appearances led by Elizabeth
Additional works we might flesh out the year with and Iain suggested a
small work by Lewis on the King James Bible and its interpretation, and a
work by Lewis was suggested from his time at Oxford as a student, his
diary, All My Road Before Me. We'll try to get these scheduled. Some other works which we're expecting to do during the year are:
Peggy leading a discussion on The Magician's Twin a group of essays edited by John West.
Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility led by Cristabel.
Mellisa leading a discussion of several essays from God In The Dock.
Search Society Blog
Monday, March 18, 2013
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Questions for March 14th Meeting
Letters to Malcolm Chiefly on Prayer
1 ) In letter one, Lewis complains of the “liturgical fidget.” He also states that, “The perfect church service would be one we were almost unaware of; our attention would have been on God.”Do you agree or disagree. Why?
Lewis then goes on to say that, “Every novelty prevents this. It fixes our attention on the service itself; and thinking about worship is a different thing from worshipping.”
Do you agree that church services must always be exactly the same to be useful?
2) In letter two, Lewis discusses memorized (or written) prayers vs. spontaneous prayers. He states that he can take or leave memorized prayers because to him “words are secondary.” What do you think he means by “words are secondary,” and do you agree or disagree?
What are your own feelings about memorized prayers vs. spontaneous prayers?
3) In letter six, Lewis objects to the very word religion because it suggests that religion is just one more department (compartment?) in life such as economic, social, intellectual etc. But, then he says that there is danger when people understand that religion shouldn’t exist as a department because people will either think that
1) it should be abolished entirely,
2) will misinterpret extending religion into all of life by insisting that more and more secular events should be opened with prayer, “that a wearisomely explicit pietism should infest our talk, there should be no more cakes and ale,”
3) sink into despair.
What do you think of this?
4) In letter eight, Lewis says, “Some people guilty about their anxieties and regard them as a defect of faith. I don’t agree at all. They are afflictions, not sins.”
Do you agree or disagree with this?
Earlier in the same letter Lewis talks about the temptation to attempt reassurances when trying to comfort someone who is facing terminal illness (or who has just lost a loved one). Lewis says, “Even now certain remembered moments of fallacious comfort twist my heart more than the remembered moment of despair.”
Discuss this. Do you agree?
Also in letter eight Lewis talks about Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. He says, “it is clear from many of His sayings that Our Lord had long forseen His death. He knew what conduct such as His, in a world such as we have made of this, must inevitably lead to. But it is clear that this knowledge must somehow have been withdrawn from Him before He prayed in Gethsemane.”
Do you agree or disagree that the knowledge that he was going to die a horrible death was “somehow withdrawn from Him?”
5) In letter sixteen, Malcolm’s wife Betty wants to know why Lewis doesn’t “use images as the rest of us do,” and accuses him of a phobia of idolatry. Lewis says that the use of images has very limited use for him and goes on to say, “I think the mere fact of keeping one’s eyes focused on something – almost any object will do – is some help towards concentration. The visual concentration symbolizes, and promotes, the mental..”
What do you think of the use of images, such as a sanctuary cross, as part of worship space and experience?
What else helps you concentrate and focus on your prayers?
Friday, February 15, 2013
Letters To Malcolm Chiefly On Prayer for March 14th
Our meeting in March will be led by Melissa who will be Skyping in. As usual the questions will be sent around by email about a week before the meeting. Last night's meeting on The Horse and His Boy was well attended and quite fun I thought. For those seeking to plan ahead here is what will be unfolding in the months to come:March 14th Letters to Malcolm Chiefly On Prayer led by Melissa
April 11th George Macdonald's Sir Gibbie led by Jane
May 9th Dorothy Sayers Letters to a Diminished Church led by Cristabel
June 13th Humphrey Carpenter's The Inklings led by Ray
July 11th Owen Barfield's Saving the Appearances led by Elizabeth
We also had some discussion on what additional works we might flesh out the year with and Iain suggested a small work by Lewis on the King James Bible and its interpretation, and a work by Lewis was suggested from his time at Oxford as a student, his diary, All My Road Before Me. We'll get those scheduled. The other works which we're expecting to do during the year are:
Peggy leading a discussion on The Magician's Twin a group of essays edited by John West.
Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility led by Cristabel.
Mellisa leading a discussion of several essays from God In The Dock.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Questions For The Horse And His Boy
Jessica will be our discussion leader for our February 14th meeting at the Barnes and Noble in Harrisonburg at 7:30 p.m.
Questions for The Horse and His Boy
1) What do you think is the theme of this book?
2) Do you think this book fits well in the Narnia series? Why or why not?
3) How do you see Aslan portrayed in the book?
4) Can you see any Biblical parallels in this story?
5) What contrasts does Lewis draw in this story between the city and country and which do you think was liked better by Lewis? Which do you like better?
6) What do you think of the statement that one of the worst results of being a slave is that when a slave gains their freedom, they may have lost the power of forcing themselves to do what needs to be done?
7) Shasta went back and helped Aravis and Hwin when they were being attacked by a lion. Why do you think he did ?
8) What do you think of the statement that when one does one good deed the reward is to be set to do another harder and better deed?
9) Does the hermit add or subtract to the story and what did you think of him and some of his sayings?
10) "I tell no-one any story but their own." What did you think when Aslan said that?
11) Aravis was wounded by Aslan. Did you think it was needed? or not?
12) Did you enjoy the way Rabadash was treated?
13) Over all, what is your opinion of this book?
14) Do you think that Shasta will be a good king when the time comes?
Questions for The Horse and His Boy
1) What do you think is the theme of this book?
2) Do you think this book fits well in the Narnia series? Why or why not?
3) How do you see Aslan portrayed in the book?
4) Can you see any Biblical parallels in this story?
5) What contrasts does Lewis draw in this story between the city and country and which do you think was liked better by Lewis? Which do you like better?
6) What do you think of the statement that one of the worst results of being a slave is that when a slave gains their freedom, they may have lost the power of forcing themselves to do what needs to be done?
7) Shasta went back and helped Aravis and Hwin when they were being attacked by a lion. Why do you think he did ?
8) What do you think of the statement that when one does one good deed the reward is to be set to do another harder and better deed?
9) Does the hermit add or subtract to the story and what did you think of him and some of his sayings?
10) "I tell no-one any story but their own." What did you think when Aslan said that?
11) Aravis was wounded by Aslan. Did you think it was needed? or not?
12) Did you enjoy the way Rabadash was treated?
13) Over all, what is your opinion of this book?
14) Do you think that Shasta will be a good king when the time comes?
Friday, January 11, 2013
February 14th Will Be "The Horse And His Boy"
Jessica will be our discussion leader on "The Horse and His Boy" from
the Chronicles of Narnia.
We had a milestone at last night's 2013 kickoff meeting
of the C.S. Lewis Society of Harrisonburg.
The first ever Skype attendee.
Melissa joined us from Pennsylvania but as with all experimental things
it suffered a little from first time syndrome.
We hope to do better in the future.
We discussed Peter Kreeft's "Between Heaven and Hell" with Peggy as our discussion
leader and we also discussed the schedule for the coming year. We didn't finish that discussion but we have
the first three months settled and some additional works sorted out.
March
14th
we'll have an experiment and Melissa will be our discussion leader through the
miracle of electronics on "Letters
to Malcolm Chiefly on Prayer."
April
11th
Jane will be our discussion leader on George Macdonald's "Sir Gibbie."
We also decided on some pairings of discussion
leader and work which I'll list below but we still have to decide when.
Melissa will be our discussion leader for some
essays from "God In The Dock."
Elizabeth will be our discussion leader for Owen
Barfield's "Saving the
Appearances."
Ray will be our discussion leader for Humphrey
Carpenter's "The Inklings."
Peggy will be our discussion leader for "The Magician's Twin" edited
by John West.
Cristabel signed on to be discussion leader for
Dorothy Sayer's "Letters to a
Diminished Church" and "Sense
and Sensibility" by Jane Austen.
This is a new category for us: Works by Writers Admired by C.S.
Lewis. We'll be setting the actual
months for these at future meetings.
Notice that there are only nine works listed so we also have two slots
open so think about what would be a good choice. A way to make sure your book gets on the
agenda is to volunteer to be the discussion leader!
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Between Heaven And Hell Discussion Questions
Discussion Questions for Between Heaven and Hell (BHAH) by Peter Kreeft, published in 1982
Introduction: Three great men died on November 22, 1963: C.S. Lewis, John F. Kennedy, and Aldous Huxley. All three were, among other things, writers of best-sellers. Lewis’s published works and life are well known to this group. Kennedy’s senior thesis, “ Appeasement in Munich,” was published as Why England Slept; another best-seller was Profiles in Courage. Huxley is perhaps best known for his futuristic novel, Brave New World, but he also wrote other fiction, drama and essays.
1. Kreeft, a conservative Catholic, imagines a Socratic dialogue among the 3 men, shortly after they died, before they went “on.” (as Professor Dumbledore would say) Is the dialogue balanced; fair; realistic? Based on Kreeft’s depictions, what is the worldview of each man?
2. Perhaps the most important question within the dialogue is : who is (was) Jesus Christ? What are other main themes?
3. What are the book’s strengths and weaknesses? What worked, what didn’t?
4. Do you agree or disagree with the following criticisms of BHAH: dumbs down humanism and pantheism too much; Kennedy and Huxley just lobbing softballs to Lewis; Kennedy and Huxley concede too easily, failing to argue with any enthusiasm or conviction.
5. Imagine that Lewis, before his death, wrote such a dialogue (same players). What might be different/ better? Are there other imaginary dialogues involving Lewis that you have read, or would like someone to write?
6. Make of this trivia (some trivial, some not) what you will: Kennedy was born across the pond from the other two, but he claimed Ireland (where Lewis was born) as his ancestral home; Huxley spent much of his adult life in America. Both Kennedy and Lewis fought in war (WWII and WWI respectively), while Huxley was a devout pacifist (for which he was refused American citizenship). Kennedy spent much time in England before and during WWII, as his father was the American Ambassador there; his time as American president was often referred to as the new Camelot. Lewis died of natural causes; Huxley died from a deliberately lethal dose of LSD; Kennedy was assassinated (for full details, see latest conspiracy theory.) Huxley extolled the virtues of illicit drugs; Kennedy was a heavy user (and alleged abuser) of prescription pain medications. Huxley’s book of essays The Doors of Perception (re: value of psychedelic experiences) shows the influence of and quotes from Blake’s Marriage of Heaven and Hell; Lewis’s The Great Divorce argues that heaven and hell are not and cannot be married. Lewis: a vertical religion; Jesus is God become man. Kennedy: a more horizontal religion; Jesus is man become God. Huxley: “whatever, man”; Jesus is one of several great sages.
7. Would you recommend this book to an agnostic friend? What about an atheist friend?
Introduction: Three great men died on November 22, 1963: C.S. Lewis, John F. Kennedy, and Aldous Huxley. All three were, among other things, writers of best-sellers. Lewis’s published works and life are well known to this group. Kennedy’s senior thesis, “ Appeasement in Munich,” was published as Why England Slept; another best-seller was Profiles in Courage. Huxley is perhaps best known for his futuristic novel, Brave New World, but he also wrote other fiction, drama and essays.
1. Kreeft, a conservative Catholic, imagines a Socratic dialogue among the 3 men, shortly after they died, before they went “on.” (as Professor Dumbledore would say) Is the dialogue balanced; fair; realistic? Based on Kreeft’s depictions, what is the worldview of each man?
2. Perhaps the most important question within the dialogue is : who is (was) Jesus Christ? What are other main themes?
3. What are the book’s strengths and weaknesses? What worked, what didn’t?
4. Do you agree or disagree with the following criticisms of BHAH: dumbs down humanism and pantheism too much; Kennedy and Huxley just lobbing softballs to Lewis; Kennedy and Huxley concede too easily, failing to argue with any enthusiasm or conviction.
5. Imagine that Lewis, before his death, wrote such a dialogue (same players). What might be different/ better? Are there other imaginary dialogues involving Lewis that you have read, or would like someone to write?
6. Make of this trivia (some trivial, some not) what you will: Kennedy was born across the pond from the other two, but he claimed Ireland (where Lewis was born) as his ancestral home; Huxley spent much of his adult life in America. Both Kennedy and Lewis fought in war (WWII and WWI respectively), while Huxley was a devout pacifist (for which he was refused American citizenship). Kennedy spent much time in England before and during WWII, as his father was the American Ambassador there; his time as American president was often referred to as the new Camelot. Lewis died of natural causes; Huxley died from a deliberately lethal dose of LSD; Kennedy was assassinated (for full details, see latest conspiracy theory.) Huxley extolled the virtues of illicit drugs; Kennedy was a heavy user (and alleged abuser) of prescription pain medications. Huxley’s book of essays The Doors of Perception (re: value of psychedelic experiences) shows the influence of and quotes from Blake’s Marriage of Heaven and Hell; Lewis’s The Great Divorce argues that heaven and hell are not and cannot be married. Lewis: a vertical religion; Jesus is God become man. Kennedy: a more horizontal religion; Jesus is man become God. Huxley: “whatever, man”; Jesus is one of several great sages.
7. Would you recommend this book to an agnostic friend? What about an atheist friend?
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

